Advisory you can actually read.
Arcline
A wealth-management platform serving 1,800 independent advisors. We replaced nineteen nested tables with a single narrative timeline, and watched advisor satisfaction climb for the first time in four years.
A dashboard that
forgot its reader.
Arcline had been built feature by feature for twelve years. The main advisor surface had become a shelf of nineteen nested tables: holdings, performance, positions, allocations, trade blotter, cash activity. It ran. But when we sat with advisors during review prep, they were printing it out, highlighting with a pen, and building their client conversation from the margins.
Two things were happening. First, the information model had drifted: every new feature got its own tab. Second, and this was the important one, the interface treated all information as equally important, so the advisor had to do the hierarchy work every single review.
Rebuild around
the review, not the record.
I ran sixteen hours of interviews across twelve advisors, three early-career, six mid, three senior, in the weeks leading up to their quarterly reviews. We watched the whole arc: prep, client meeting, follow-ups. The findings were uncomfortably consistent.
- The review is a story, not a snapshot. Advisors pieced together a narrative across five tabs. The product made them do that stitching every time.
- Events beat numbers. A rebalance, a life event, a market move, these are what clients remember. Positions are evidence, not the point.
- Default to defensible. Advisors worked slower than expected because they were double-checking the interface, not the data.
The redesign collapsed the nineteen tables into a single household timeline. Every visible row is an event you can point at in a client meeting: a deposit, a contribution, a tax harvest, a model change. Numbers live inside the events, not the other way around.
The small decisions that
did the heavy lifting.
- One fixed-width mono table for all numeric columns. Advisors glanced at alignment to catch errors before they caught the numbers.
- A timeline that expands in place rather than pushing users to a new page, preserving the context of the review.
- Filters are opinionated defaults, not empty dropdowns. “Since last review,” “Only events I need to explain,” “Flagged for follow-up.”
- A quiet motion language: 180 ms ease-out transitions, no bounce. Nothing here wanted to feel playful.
Final advisor timeline · v3.2 · shipped August 2025
What changed,
and how we measured.
Median time to assemble a quarterly review, measured across 34 advisors over six weeks.
First meaningful move in four years. Retention for advisors on the new surface climbed from 82% to 94%.
One unified timeline table. Every removed table had at least one advocate in the old dashboard, the process mattered.